H.R. 7072 · 117th Congress · House

NDO Fairness Act

In Congress· Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced
Mar 15, 22
Passed House
Jun 21, 22
Passed Senate
Pending
Sent to President
Pending
Signed into Law
Pending

Executive Summary

NDO Fairness Act

This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.

Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.

With respect to delayed notification orders, the bill

  • raises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,
  • requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts,
  • requires orders to be narrowly tailored, and
  • shortens the duration of delayed notification orders.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Previous Versions

07Jun 13, 2022

NDO Fairness Act

This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.

Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.

With respect to delayed notification orders, the bill

  • raises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,
  • requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts,
  • requires orders to be narrowly tailored, and
  • shortens the duration of delayed notification orders.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

00Mar 15, 2022

NDO Fairness Act

This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.

Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.

With respect to delayed notification orders, the bill

  • raises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,
  • requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts,
  • requires orders to be narrowly tailored, and
  • shortens the duration of delayed notification orders.

The bill authorizes civil remedies for a subscriber or customer who is aggrieved by a violation.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Action Timeline

15
  1. JUN 22, 2022IntroReferral

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. JUN 21, 2022Floor

    Mr

    Cicilline moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  3. JUN 21, 2022Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules

    (consideration: CR H5698-5700)

    5698Yea
    5700Nay
    0NV
  4. JUN 21, 2022Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 7072.

  5. JUN 21, 2022Floor

    Passed/agreed to in House

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  6. JUN 21, 2022Floor

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5698-5699)

    5698Yea
    5699Nay
    0NV
  7. JUN 21, 2022Floor

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. JUN 13, 2022Committee

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-361.

    117Yea
    361Nay
    0NV
  9. JUN 13, 2022Committee

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-361.

    117Yea
    361Nay
    0NV
  10. JUN 13, 2022Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 273.

  11. APR 06, 2022Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  12. APR 06, 2022Committee

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  13. MAR 15, 2022IntroReferral

    Introduced in House

  14. MAR 15, 2022IntroReferral

    Introduced in House

  15. MAR 15, 2022IntroReferral

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Committees

4

Judiciary Committee

ssju00

Referred: Jun 22, 2022

Active

Judiciary Committee

hsju00

Referred: Jun 13, 2022

Active

Judiciary Committee

hsju00

Referred: Apr 6, 2022

Active

Judiciary Committee

hsju00

Referred: Mar 15, 2022

Active