Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2024
This bill provides FY2024 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies.
The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for
The bill provides appropriations to the Department of the Interior for the Central Utah Project and the Bureau of Reclamation.
The bill provides appropriations to DOE for energy programs, including
The bill also provides appropriations to DOE for
The bill provides appropriations to several independent agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The bill includes provisions that address the operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP), which is a federal water project in California owned and operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, and the California State Water Project (SWP), which is operated jointly with the CVP.
In addition, the bill makes the Bureau of Reclamation the lead agency for the purpose of coordinating all permitting and related activities required to construct certain new surface water storage projects.
The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2024
This bill provides FY2024 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies.
The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for
The bill provides appropriations to the Department of the Interior for the Central Utah Project and the Bureau of Reclamation.
The bill provides appropriations to DOE for energy programs, including
The bill also provides appropriations to DOE for
The bill provides appropriations to several independent agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The bill includes provisions that address the operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP), which is a federal water project in California owned and operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, and the California State Water Project (SWP), which is operated jointly with the CVP.
In addition, the bill makes the Bureau of Reclamation the lead agency for the purpose of coordinating all permitting and related activities required to construct certain new surface water storage projects.
The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2024
This bill provides FY2024 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies.
The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for
The bill provides appropriations to the Department of the Interior for the Central Utah Project and the Bureau of Reclamation.
The bill provides appropriations to DOE for energy programs, including
The bill also provides appropriations to DOE for
The bill provides appropriations to several independent agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The bill includes provisions that address the operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP), which is a federal water project in California owned and operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, and the California State Water Project (SWP), which is operated jointly with the CVP.
In addition, the bill makes the Bureau of Reclamation the lead agency for the purpose of coordinating all permitting and related activities required to construct certain new surface water storage projects.
The bill also sets forth requirements and restrictions for using funds provided by this and other appropriations acts.
Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 233.
(consideration: CR H5110-5152)
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi amendment No. 36.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi amendment No. 37.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 38.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 39.
39, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Fleischmann demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 40.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson (TX) amendment No. 41.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lamborn amendment No. 42.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Luna amendment No. 43.
43, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Luna amendment No. 44.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCormick amendment No. 45.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 46.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 47.
47, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 48.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 49.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 50.
50, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 51.
51, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. James demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 52.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 53.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Palmer amendment No. 54.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pfluger amendment No. 56.
56, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pfluger amendment No. 57.
57, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rosendale amendment No. 58.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rosendale amendment No. 59.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rosendale amendment No. 60.
Castor (FL) moved to recommit to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR H5150)
199 - 210 (Roll no. 557).
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 199 (Roll no. 558).
210 - 199 (Roll no. 558).
Res. 756. (consideration: CR H5066-5100)
4394 and H.R. 4364. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4394 and H.R. 4364. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4394, under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4364 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. The resolution lays H. Res. 699 on the table.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Fleischmann amendment en bloc.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 3.
3, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Watson Coleman demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Neguse amendment No. 12.
12, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Neguse amendment No. 13.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Westerman amendment No. 14.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Griffith amendment No. 15.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roy amendment No. 16.
16, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Roy demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 19.
19, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 20.
20, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Norman demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 25.
25, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 26.
26, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 27.
27, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 28.
28, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 29.
29, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 30.
30, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 31.
31, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 32.
32, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced the nays had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cammack amendment No. 34.
Res. 756, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fallon amendment No. 35.
Fleischmann moved that the committee rise.
4394 as unfinished business.
Res. 756 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4394 and H.R. 4364. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4394 and H.R. 4364. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4394, under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4364 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. The resolution lays H. Res. 699 on the table.
Rept. 118-126, by Mr. Fleischmann.
Rept. 118-126, by Mr. Fleischmann.