Strategic Production Response Act
This bill limits the drawdown of petroleum in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) until the Department of Energy (DOE) submits to Congress a plan to increase the percentage of federal lands leased for oil and gas production. Specifically, the bill prohibits DOE from drawing down petroleum in the SPR for nonemergency purposes until it submits a plan to increase the percentage of federal lands, including submerged lands of the Outer Continental Shelf, that are leased for oil and gas production to offset any drawdowns on or after January 21, 2021.
Strategic Production Response Act
This bill limits the drawdown of petroleum in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve until the Department of Energy develops a plan to increase the percentage of federal lands leased for oil and gas production.
(consideration: CR H435-471)
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Grijalva amendment No. 145 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson (NC) amendment No. 46 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 147 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sherman amendment No. 88 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sherman amendment No. 88 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lieu amendment No. 61 under the five-minute rule.
61, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Lieu demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lieu amendment No. 62 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Nickel amendment No. 77 under the five-minute rule.
77, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nickel demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Pallone amendment No. 95 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 205 (Roll no. 93).
221 - 205 (Roll no. 93).
CR H351-421; text: CR H361-362)
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gaetz amendment No. 1 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Pallone amendment No. 104 under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order. Subsequently the point of order was withdrawn.
104, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Mace amendment No. 133 under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
133, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Castor (FL) amendment No. 3 under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Greene (GA) amendment No. 2 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Blunt Rochester amendment No. 71 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the LaLota amendment No. 143 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cleaver amendment No. 8 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Clyde amendment No. 91 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cleaver amendment No. 9 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Boebert amendment No. 32 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Soto amendment No. 44 under the five-minute rule.
44, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Soto demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Boebert amendment No. 33 under the five-minute rule.
33, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Spanberger amendment No. 29 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Boebert amendment No. 137 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tlaib amendment No. 10 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Perry amendment No. 41 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tlaib amendment No. 11 under the five-minute rule.
11, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Tlaib demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Huffman amendment No. 15 under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
15, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Huffman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Huffman amendment No. 15 under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
65, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Huffman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Panetta amendment No. 26 under the five-minute rule.
26, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Panetta demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Levin amendment No. 18 under the five-minute rule.
18, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Levin demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DelBene amendment No. 7 under the five-minute rule.
7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. DelBene demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Barr amendment No. 48 under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Levin amendment No. 21 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Grijalva amendment No. 55 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Grijalva amendment No. 56 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Grijalva amendment No. 57 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Thompson (CA) amendment No. 23 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DeGette amendment No. 89 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
89, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. DeGette demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Torres (CA) amendment No. 50 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gottheimer amendment No. 85 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gottheimer amendment No. 86 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cohen amendment No. 129 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
129, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cohen demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Robert Garcia (CA) amendment No. 53 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lee (CA) amendment No. 84 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Payne amendment No. 76 under the five-minute rule.
76, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Payne demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Magaziner amendment No. 59 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Magaziner amendment No. 58 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Goldman (NY) amendment No. 16 under the five-minute rule, pending a reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ocasio-Cortez amendment No. 74 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ocasio-Cortez amendment No. 72 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ocasio-Cortez amendment No. 73 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 35 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 36 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ross amendment No. 70 under the five-minute rule.
70, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Ross demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Casten amendment No. 66 under the five-minute rule.
66, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Weber (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Casten amendment No. 67 under the five-minute rule.
67, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Casten demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Casten amendment No. 68 under the five-minute rule.
68, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Casten demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Wasserman Schultz amendment No. 75 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Schneider amendment No. 131 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Manning amendment No. 27 under the five-minute rule.
27, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Manning demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Scholten amendment No. 60 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lee (NV) amendment No. 25 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Porter amendment No. 45 under the five-minute rule.
45, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Porter demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Vasquez amendment No. 63 under the five-minute rule.
63, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Vasquez demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Vasquez amendment No. 64 under the five-minute rule.
64, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Vasquez demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cicilline amendment No. 135 under the five-minute rule. Pending the reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the point of order was withdrawn.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Quigley amendment No. 125 under the five-minute rule. Pending the reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Takano amendment No. 80 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Takano amendment No. 81 under the five-minute rule.
81, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Takano demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Takano amendment No. 82 under the five-minute rule. Pending the reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Castro (TX) amendment No. 4 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Barragan amendment No. 24 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Plaskett amendment No. 43 under the five-minute rule.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Perez amendment No. 79 under the five-minute rule.
79, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Perez demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Bowman amendment No. 92 under the five-minute rule.
92, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Bowman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tlaib amendment No. 13 under the five-minute rule. Pending the reservation of a point of order.
Res. 5, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tlaib amendment No. 14 under the five-minute rule.
Armstrong moved that the Committee rise.
21 as unfinished business.